Showing posts with label Stewart Home. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stewart Home. Show all posts

Wednesday, 16 June 2021

Stewart Home Interviewed By Life Can't Wait

MIKE: What writers and books inspired you to become a writer ?

HOME: It was never my plan to become a writer. As a kid I read a lot but I was much more into rock and roll and in particular glam rock than the idea of being a writer. At the start of the seventies my favourite band was T.Rex but I liked most glam stuff as long as it had a decent stomp from Sweet through to Iron Virgin. I’m old enough to remember when Rebels Rule was getting some heavy radio play and at the time I couldn’t believe it didn’t become a hit and Iron Virgin disappeared. The couple of years before punk was a bit of a desert as far as new music went -  so I went backwards into northern soul coz I knew a lot of people into that but also British mod and what became known as freakbeat, I was listening to earlier Pretty Things and Downliners Sect in 1975. Back then I didn’t realise my taste in northern soul was very mod orientated, more Twisted Wheel than Wigan, I only found out about those distinctions later. I got into punk in the summer of 1976 after seeing the Pistols on So It Goes, and immediately discovered Nuggets and all that USA porto-punk - I knew Lou Reed’s solo stuff from the seventies but the Stooges, Patti Smith, Flamin’ Groovies and MC5 were all new to me as a 14 year-old in 1976. But punk wasn’t nearly as popular at my school as northern soul and then jazz funk for the hipster kids, or disco for those that just followed the charts.

As far as writers from that era go there were a whole raft of pulp writers doing everything from horror to youthsploitation but if I was gonna pull out one key influence it would be the Mike Norman hells angels books that I first read when I was 11 or 12, around the same time I was getting into kung fu films…. I was also reading a lot of Michael Moorcock but more Elric titles than Jerry Cornelius, I read Moorcock’s more experimental stuff later.Of course loads of kids I knew read The Rats by James Herbert around 1974/5 that and the skinhead books were probably the biggest sensations in my milieu at the time. A lot of the white boys at my school were also into Sven Hassel but I didn’t like nazi shit so I didn’t read them and neither did the girls (although many dug stuff like The Rats). Some of the African and Afro-Caribbean kids at my school also read those books but the Muslim kids who made up about 25% of the pupils weren’t interested in any of that stuff at all  There’s an interview with Mick Norman, his real name was Laurence James, on my website, coz the first four books he wrote are really important to me and he was also the editor for the earlier Richard Allen skinhead books. Sadly he died 20 years ago but I was glad I got to know him at the end of his life. https://www.stewarthomesociety.org/interviews/james.htm

MIKE: You seem to always have some kind of project on the go, are you type of person who struggles to take it easy or is it a case of stay busy to pay bills ?

HOME: I just like doing things so I don’t really like to take it easy. I don’t think making money is a good motivation for doing anything other than a 9 to 5 work, although its great if my stuff makes a few bob and I can continue to avoid a regular job…. But I’m curious about many things including exercise systems and I never have the time to try our all the fitness regimes that fascinate me coz generally I can’t set aside more than a few hours a day to workout, although on the odd occasions I’ve gone on a sports holiday and done 6 or 7 hours a day of training I’ve really enjoyed it but of course you have to mix hardcore strength and cardio with gentler stuff like stretching, it would be counterproductive to spend that much time on nonstop weightlifting for a week or two!

MIKE I first read you back in 93, 94 Red London & No Pity but have not kept up with all your work through the years, what books of yours would you reccomend to people new to you ? 

HOME: There is a lot of variation between the different books and which to recommend would depend on someones’s interests and tastes. No Pity and Red London were part of a cycle of early books riffing on youthsploitation fiction - of those books the last Slow Death really puts a polish on what I was doing but in some ways Defiant Pose is my favourite and I think it has the single best scene, one where the Houses of Parliament are burned to the ground while the main character gets his cock out and recites an incendiary revolutionary tract. But it was 69 Things To Do With A Dead Princess that got the attention of the literary types as it’s more experimental and shows my interest in writers like Alain Robbe-Grillet and Ann Quin. I’m very fond of Tainted Love which is fiction but closely based on my mother’s life once she came to London when she was 16 in 1960 - she was working with the likes of Christine Keeler as a hostess at Murray’s Cabaret Club before I was born, then involved in the early LSD scene but sadly died of heroin overdose in 1979. She packed a lot into her short but incredible life. I did her story as a novel so as to avoid problems with certain people who were still living but most of what’s in it is true. I had to change a few things around to avoid libel problems as that one came out with a corporate publisher.

MIKE: I absolutely loved She's My Witch that I read around Xmas time , I think it's my favourite book of yours of ones I have read, can you tell us a bit about it ?

HOME: That came out of observing what was happening to people who’d been going to punk and garage rock gigs for a long time but I simultaneously wanted to do a story similar to my mother’s but for a generation down. So rather than coming to London from South Wales like my mother, the main character Maria has come to London from Valencia - it’s the same trajectory as my mother but a woman from my generation rather than the previous one. So instead of modern jazz and beatniks, the subcultural interest is punk rock. And there is an involvement with witchcraft rather than Indian gurus. I didn’t make a big thing out of it in Tainted Love but one of my mother’s favourite books was the BDSM classic Story of O by Pauline Réage AKA  Anne Desclos. So while in Tainted Love my mother does high class hostessing, as she did in real life, Maria in She’s My Witch is a former dominatrix. Over the years quite a few woman who’ve worked as a dominatrix have told me they like my fiction, so I’ve got to know a few. Recently I’ve been making art with Itziar Bilbao Urrutia, who as her name implies is from Bilbao and for a couple of decades has been the premier suspension bondage dominatrix in London. But I wrote the first draft of Witch before I met Itzi. The end of the story also parallels my mother’s life, Maria dies from a heroin overdose.

In some ways Tainted Love and Witch addresses something that few punks wanted to deal with back in the seventies, which is how close a lot of what we did was to the earlier freak subculture, so I wanted to draw that out with stories of two lives a generation apart. I also thought it was interesting to address albeit obliquely the Ruta Destroy Valencia party scene of the post-Franco period. There’s not much about it in English and it was nice to start to correct that. I was just struck going to punk and garage gigs in London a decade or so ago by how many people from the Iberian peninsula I met there who’d moved to London and who’d gone to all those amazing clubs to the south of Valencia back in the day. Of course there are loads of other subcultural scenes from that and other times which have been ignored. Just before I left school in 78 a few of the kids in my year who’d been very into northern soul were getting into the Britfunk scene and were moving over to being jazzfunkateers - that whole thing was huge around the same time as punk in the UK but its been largely ignored too, so it was nice to see a piece about it by Alexis Petridis in The Guardian last week.

MIKE: You edited Denizen of the Dead book which was great fun if you dislike gentrification,  were you happy with that ?

HOME: When I originally had the idea for Denizen of the Dead I thought I’d do a novel based on these luxury investment blocks that are being built all around me and across London. But on reflection it made more sense to do an anthology with different writers because it was meant to be a form of protest and that should be collective. Novels are a lot easier to get attention for than short story collections but I think I made the right decision to do an anthology. I’m really happy with the book and I particularly like the fact it has the sigil spells in it, I worked with some witches to do a protest called Hex In The Park against gentrification in east central London in 2017 and when I said I was doing the book they said I had to have a spell against Neo-liberalism in it and they’d do it. That wouldn’t have happened if I’d just done a novel on my own, so I’m pleased it panned out the way it did. Also if London had been gentrified in the late-seventies like it is now, we’d have never had those huge punk rock and Britfunk scenes, there just wouldn’t have been the venues for them. Lower property prices do an enormous amount for creativity, gentrification kills it. There’s some film of Hex In The Park on my YouTube channel: https://youtu.be/nYMQiBlY4eg

MIKE: I just started 9 Lives of Ray the Cat Jones, your latest book, tell us a bit about that ? 

HOME: Many of my books are entirely made up but like Tainted Love that is based on a true story but done as fiction because it wasn’t possible to get to the truth about everything to do with my mum’s cousin Ray Jones. There are a lot fo criminals in my family but Ray is the most famous one. I hadn’t intended to do a book about him but I was talking to the writer Paul Buck one day and he said he didn’t believe the story about my relative’s escape from Pentonville although he’d included it in his book The E-List about prison escapes. The version of the story Paul had came from Mad Frankie Fraser and I thought it was bullshit too, so I asked Paul why he hadn’t researched the incident. Paul said he didn’t know how to do that but I did, so I went back through old newspapers and of course it turned out the Frankie Fraser version was a pretty stupid exaggeration of a very successful escape.Another interesting thing about Ray was he was a burglar with left-wing views when most London criminals leaned to the right - maybe that’s because like my mother he grew up in South Wales and came to London as a young adult. Anyway I found the books about crime in London in the 50s and 60s which mentioned Ray pretty fictional, so I figured I’d do the story as a novel. I had a fair bit of true material to work from including Ray’s own outline of his life alongside newspaper reports of his court appearances going back to the early 1940s. I thought it was a story that needed telling. It originally came out in 2014 but it was soon out of print, so it’s just been reissued. There aren’t too many books about class conscious cat burglars so I’m proud to have done one.

MIKE: How have you coped with lockdown? Has it affected you much in terms of promoting your work, or has it been more of a pain to your social life ? 

HOME: Worst thing about lockdown has been not being able to go out and do talks and readings coz I’d pick up money for that and sell a few books at the same time. Not being able to go out in person definitely has a negative effect on book sales, so that’s a downer. And of course I miss all the beautiful people I used to encounter at garage gigs too! I’ve got a foldout weights bench and a load of weights, so I’m happy enough at home because I can workout - glad I got all that stuff cheap over the years coz lockdown really made exercise equipment expensive. My view of lockdown was it was an unfortunate necessity to halt Covid, I just think the UK government handled it really badly, they should have acted sooner and been stricter so that we didn’t have to endure such long lockdown periods. Johnson and his cronies really need to be held to account for how badly they handled things, and those most directly involved in stupidity like the Eat Out To Help Out scheme really do deserve some form of punishment. It seems like they were more interested in corruptly handing out money to their posh mates than our welfare.

MIKE: What five albums would you grab if house was on fire?  As you are a writer would you grab any books as well ? 

HOME: Coz I’ve not been getting to any gigs due to the pandemic I’d go for all live albums right now…. which wouldn’t necessarily be the case in other situations. So in a soul groove Aretha Franklin Live at Fillmore West and Major Lance Live At The Torch, Punk rock would have to be Jayne County Rock 'N' Roll Resurrection (Live 1980) and the Adam and the Ants In Bondage 1978-79 bootleg, for the live 1978 Marquee set included on it. I saw the Ants a load of times at the Marquee in 1978, as well as at other places but never saw them after the last appearance of the old Ants at the Electric Ballroom at the end of December 1979. They really were the best band regularly playing London back in 1978/9, so it’s a real shame there aren’t better recordings of some of those songs! Final album would have be to be a toss up between Slade Alive and Hawkwind’s Space Ritual, which ever came to hand first but both are great examples of post-sixties but pre-punk rock and roll. Books? I’d have to save my sixties hardback and paperback copies of Terry Taylor’s Baron’s Court All Change - he was the inspiration for the narrator of Absolute Beginners by Colin MacInnes and was an incredible guy and friend of my mum. Baron’s Court is about early mod culture at the end of the fifties/beginning of the sixties straight from the horse’s mouth and published in 1961. it’s also the first British novel to mention LSD!

MIKE: What are you working on currently ? 

HOME: Well as I can’t go out to get inspiration it’s a lockdown novel about a guy going crazy in his one bedroom council flat in Islington…. while practising ninjitsu on Zoom and watching a load of old ninja movies. I’ve got another book called Art School Orgy finished but that has some legal issues so may be hard to get published immediately. Had the same problem with Denizen of the Dead, publishers really don’t like any risk of legal action even if it’s pretty unlikely. I’d like to be making some films too but that will probably have to wait until I can work with others on them, once we’re on the other side of the pandemic.

MIKE: I read something about Joe England saying you inspired him, does it feel good to be passing the torch so to speak, not that you are coming to end of career ? 

HOME: Always nice to be told you’re an inspiration but especially by someone whose work grooves you! We all need to get ideas from somewhere, we’re not creating in a vacuum. I got a load of inspiration from other writers too, so yeah the torch has to move on…. although I’ve no plans to stop writing for the time being I may shift to more non-fiction for a while. My last non-fiction book Re-Enter The Dragon: Genre Theory, Brucesploitation and the Sleazy Joys of Lowbrow Cinema came out in 2018, so it would be nice to follow that up with another film book…. but then my love of martial arts and exercise might also lead to some more sport orientated titles too.

This interview original appeared as a Facebook punk post.

Monday, 31 May 2021

Stewart Home Interviewed by Spanish Magazine Bruxismo In 2021

B. From what I've heard, the English literary press is a little afraid of you. What was their reaction to the publication of Tainted Love?

H. I’ve got the press cuttings somewhere but I’d have to look them out. The book that really made a difference to perceptions of me as a writer was 69 Things To Do With A Dead Princess, which was my seventh novel. Tainted Love was my ninth novel but I was doing non-fiction books as well, cultural commentary on anti-art movements and punk rock. Before Dead Princess I just had a reputation as a troublemaker among literary types but when that book came out I got praised for having a subversive grip on literary form. Tainted Love is one of only two books of mine that was sold in English through a literary agent, so it was on a corporate publisher Virgin. I don’t think people were really expecting to find me on that type of publisher or to do a book based on my mother’s life. I don’t remember much about the reviews but I do remember my agent saying Virgin had done a really good job of publicising the book which made me laugh. I don’t think their press department knew what to do with me but they got some radio coverage on the BBC and even sent a new PR girl they’d hired to take me to the radio station… that was unusual too because I was used to going and doing those things on my own rather than than having someone from the publisher to hold my hand. Of course it is nice to have someone looking after you every step of the way but it isn’t necessary. Anyway all the coverage the agent liked I engineered from my own contacts which were pretty good by that time, and of course because the press came through me it was positive. But even today I think a lot of literary types are still frightened of me - and also puzzled by some of my friendships with other writers because they don’t understand what I have in common with say Lynne Tillman or Chloe Aridjis.

B. I can imagine many were surprised to read that Tainted Love's main character is your mother, Julia-Callan Thompson, although it's not exactly biographical. How much of the book is true, and how much is fiction?

H. As far as I can tell it’s mostly true, the fictional element comes from me writing it in the first person as my mother to tell the story, although she is renamed Jilly rather than Julie because I’m treating it as fiction. About 20 years ago I did a lot of research into my mother’s life and talked to everyone I could get hold of who knew her and was willing to chat. It was difficult to get people to go into any detail was her sex work, although it was obvious to me she’d been doing that. Her friends mostly didn’t want to talk about that aspect of her life but I forced the issue with a few of them. With a lot of people I had to keep going back to them to get fuller stories, and of course in some instances it looked to me like they or their partners were also doing sex work but I wouldn’t challenge the sometimes utterly unbelievable tales some came up with to show this wasn’t the case.I was interested in my mother and not bothered about getting to the bottom of her friend’s lives.

I spent years trying to get hold of Terry Taylor and when I finally did he was much more frank about my mother and sex work for the simple reason that I was, as he put it, hip enough to appreciate her. Of course there were variant versions of stories about my mother and instances where different sources or even the same source at different times told contradictory tales. I often had to make critical judgements about what was and wasn’t true, on the whole those weren’t hard calls as some sources were obviously more reliable than others. I also had my mother’s diary, address book and some other papers that all helped. I’ve put some non-fiction about my mother and that probably gives a good idea of how I arrived at the version of her life-story I used in the novel. There was an enormous amount of research involved. In terms of the non-fiction about my mother maybe a good place to start is with The Real Dharma Bums (https://www.stewarthomesociety.org/praxis/dharmabums.htm) and to then move on to 2 Ladbroke Grove Hipsters of the 1960s (https://stewarthomesociety.org/blog/2009/03/18/grainger-trina-2-ladbroke-grove-hipsters-of-the-1960s/). Those are about the two great loves of her life. That said, I’m not claiming to be right on every detail of her life.

B. The novel portrays London's subcultures of the sixties in a different light to the usual – less sugar-coated if you will. Do you think that people often view the different subcultures of that era as having little to no correlation, when the reality was rather the opposite?

H. I think the problem is that people like things they can recognise and so they want a familiar story and recognisable names. But if you actually examine the historical evidence things turn out to be very different to the fairy-tales that are told again and again. That’s obviously in terms of drug culture to take just one example. When I was looking into my mother’s life I knew she knew Terry Taylor and I knew he’d been the real-life inspiration for the main character in Absolute Beginners by Colin MacInnes. Since Terry had written a book Baron’s Court, All Change I thought I should read it and was really surprised to discover it was a lost classic about the birth of British mod culture. Now the standard understanding was that stylish mods took amphetamines and the sloppily dressed kids were into dope. But in Baron’s Court it’s the other way around and Terry obviously knew the score on that and was giving an accurate albeit fictional description of those scenes. Terry, my mother and various other characters were also connected to Victor James Kapur. Back then the story was Operation Julie in the 1970s was the first big acid bust in the UK. Talking to people from my mother’s circle I got to know about the big bust of Kapur’s two London labs in 1967, although no one I spoke to could remember the name of the chemist and I had to chase it up in old newspaper stories (which weren’t hard to find). When I finally spoke to Terry Taylor, he of course remembered Kapur and was able to name him, but I’d identified the chemist from press reports by then. I brought the story of the UKs first major acid factory bust back into circulation in an essay I did for the book Psychedelic Art, Social Crisis and Counterculture in the 1960s edited by Christoph Grunenberg and Jonathan Harris in 2005. Subsequently it was taken up by Andy Roberts in his 2008 book Albion Dreaming: A Social History of LSD in Britain and has subsequently spread further. So now anybody who knows anything about UK acid culture knows Operation Julie wasn’t the first major manufacturing bust but for about 30 years that fairytale was the dominant story in the media at least.

That said you can go to other areas of British subculture and discover the dominant stories about them aren’t true. For example the idea that the skinhead cult started in the east end of London in 1969. Anyone who cares to look at photos of the Hounslow mod/skinhead band Neat Change can see a couple of members of this group were west London skinheads before they broke up in 1968, and their singer Jimmy Edwards told me they were skinheads in 1966! No one was much interested in that until I put an interview with Jimmy Edwards on my website in 2010 alongside some pictures of the band which I got from their guitarist Brian Sprackling, I don’t think they’d been published before I put them on my site, they certainly weren’t online. Since the band broke up in 1968, it’s obvious they adopted the skinhead look before then and probably by 1967 and at a stretch in 1966 as their singer Jimmy Edwards claimed. Whatever way you look at it there is clear evidence there that there were skinheads in west London before 1969, so skinhead didn’t originate in east London in the last year of the sixties as is so often - and completely wrongly - claimed. I only had small versions of the photos on my site but a few people picked up on what I’d done and reused them larger elsewhere (as I had bigger versions from Brian). The original interview I did with Jimmy Edwards is here, sadly he’s not alive any longer:  <https://www.stewarthomesociety.org/interviews/edwards.htm>

So the history of these subcultures is totally mythologised and most people don’t understand much about their real evolution. They are more closely connected than many of those involved in them want to admit. In the late-seventies, I’d switch continually between punk, mod, rude boy and skin styles - I couldn’t see the point of getting hung up on just one. Some where less fluid in the adoption of subcultures but. minority were like me. One of the reasons my book has the title Tainted Love is because when I was at school I had a friend whose older brother worked in a factory and would come home while I was hanging out with his sibling. In the mid-seventies a lot of the kids at my school were into boot boy culture which had evolved out of skinhead and suedehead, and although we were down south a lot of the boot boys were also into northern soul. My friend’s brother really liked northern tunes and in the mid-seventies Tainted Love was considered a hot northern soul spin, although obviously later it became too well known to be considered very cool on that scene. Anyway, my friend’s brother would come in from his factory job and put on a record and drink a cup of tea before going to tinker with his motorbike or whatever, and the record he put on most often was Tainted Love. The older brother had been adopted so I always associated that tune with kids who’d been separated from their mothers. But one of the oddities about my friend’s brother was that apart from northern soul, he was really obsessed with the prog rock band Greenslade, so aside from some northern tunes, I first became acquainted with a some of the more obscure progressive rock bands because of him too.

B. In the book you state; "Anyone who thinks you can understand the history of London in the sixties by looking at the lives of Mary Quant, Twiggy, Bailey and The Shrimp, Mick Jagger, Michael Caine and Terrence Stamp, is sadly deluded". Could you elaborate on this?

H. History from below is always more interesting than the stories of so-called ‘great’ men and it usually is men, although I’ve quite consciously pulled out the names of some well-known women from the sixties. There’s a much more interesting story to be told about the sixties than that to be found in the memoirs of the more prominent sixties figures and those who are impressed by them and write about that decade as if it consists only of them. That’s partly why I wanted to tell my mother’s story but as fiction, because biography and autobiography always and already is fiction. I also remember the sixties since I was born at the start of the decade and for me it wasn’t all about The Beatles, I remember waiting for the bus to go to school when The Beatles broke up and some of the older kids were really cut up about it but I didn’t give a damn coz I wasn’t into The Beatles. In terms of media the sixties for me was much more about spy flicks and TV shows and stuff like that. I really used to love The Man From UNCLE, I used to stay up late to watch it when I was five years old. So there isn’t just one sixties, there are many sixties that people experienced in London, and even more variations of the sixties experienced around the world. Nearly a decade after I did Tainted Love I wrote a book based on the life of my mother’s cousin Ray The Cat Jones who was a well-known burglar who made a front page headline grabbing escape from Pentonville Prison in London in 1958. He was a lot older than my mother and his life covered a longer time period, but in my book he encounters my mother’s world in the sixties and seventies and its completely alien to him and his experiences. His sixties is very different to my mother’s sixties. But again it’s a history from below and while The 9 Lives of Ray The Cat Jones is a novel and fictional, it’s probably truer to life than vast majority of ghost-written criminal autobiographies.

B. Lots of celebrities appear, though many of them in very questionable situations. The John Lennon and Brian Jones cameos come to mind. Weren't you afraid of getting into legal problems?

H. I have my mother’s address book and John Lennon is in it alongside a lot of other pop musicians and cultural figures, there are an incredible number of well known people in there - but I found the lesser knowns more interesting to research. One publisher rejected the book because they didn’t like the stuff about Lennon which is as far as I can tell pretty true to life. I thought everyone knew Lennon could be a complete arsehole. However there were no libel issues with Lennon because the dead aren’t protected by libel laws and he was dead long before I wrote the book.

There were two other figures I wanted to include from the pop scene of the sixties but both were still alive when I wrote the book - and still are now - I’d heard stories about them and my mother but couldn’t use them because they are rich enough to sue and in England the libel laws are about protecting protecting the rich not the truth. One of them is nearly as well known as Lennon so including him would have been a huge risk and probably no publisher would have taken the book if I’d insisted he was in it. So Brian Jones was a substitute for these two figures and he behaves like Brain Jones - I read several books about him to get a grasp on that - rather than those he is a substitute for.

If you read the pop picker sections of Tainted Love and look at Robert Frank’s Cocksucker Blues documentary of the Rolling Stones 1972 US tour, then you’ll see how you might re-read the film to make it as true to life as my writing. There’s a woman presented as a groupie but she’s a junkie and to me looks like a pro. My impression is the managements and record companies preferred professional sex workers to groupies because they didn’t expected to be treated as special or for some kind of lasting relationship to develop, so they were generally much less trouble than groupies. As a result pros would be put in for the band by those working with them because it was considered safe, and of course a lot of sex workers used drugs and would deal them on the side, so it was all handy. That’s not to say the pop star in question necessarily knew they were dealing with a sex worker because they weren’t the person parting with dosh for the service.

Eckhart Schmidt’s 1982 movie The Fan doesn’t deal with the pro side of things but it’s a fictional exploration of just how badly things can go wrong with when a pop musician sleeps with a fan. I see fiction as a much more direct route and honest way to get to the truth in terms of individual lives than biography and especially autobiography where you couldn’t substitute Brain Jones for those who are still alive and protected by wealth. Another figure I didn’t put into Tainted Love because they were living when I wrote the book is Sean Connery. My mother claimed that the Bond actor paid for a good time with her when she was working as a hostess at Churchills in Bond Street in 1964. Of course, the fact my mother said this doesn’t make it true but since it would be hard to prove one way or the other, it would have been tempting to use if Connery had died younger than he eventually did. That said, there’s more evidence for the pop musicians than the actor.

B. The novel's timeline reaches the end of the seventies, with counterculture already fully amortised as a mass phenomenon. In your view, was it a failed revolution or just a by-product of the birth of the late-capitalist consumer society?

H. Elements of the counterculture were revolutionary but it wasn’t revolutionary across the board, in fact it was quite a mixed bag but under capitalism we all reproduce our own alienation. I do think en bloc it was more than just a a by-product of late-capitalist consumerism, although the latter is characteristic of parts of it. But there’s also a danger of fetishising the sixties and overlooking the flappers and cocaine frenzies of the twenties, or the Zoot boys of the forties.

B. The use and abuse of drugs is a recurrent theme in the novel and, for that generation, was more than just a hedonistic escape. The use of illegal substances is probably more widespread today than ever but detached from these countercultural or psychedelic values. What do you think about drugs and their relationship with counterculture?

H. Drugs were absolutely crucial to the counterculture, alongside sex work they financed a lot of it but of course they were more than that since there was a deep interest in expanding consciousness in parts of the beatnik and hippie subcultures. That’s one of the things missing from the straighter parts of the revolutionary milieu, the understanding that mature communism isn’t just about the return at a higher level of the anti-economic forms of primitive communist societies but also about reclaiming the characteristic modes of consciousness of such social forms, which we could say is characterised by shamanism. I’d agree drug use is more widespread today and also largely detached from a psychedelic desire to expand consciousness. My most recent novel in English She’s My Witch addresses that in an oblique way, since the main character Maria is into both occult modes of consciousness and drugs but they are separate pursuits to her in a way they were not for my mother in the sixties. She’s My Witch is very much an attempt to take a subcultural life-story that is similar to my mother’s but a generation down so it is punk rock and witchcraft rather than beatnik jazz and Indian gurus that fire Maria’s imagination. Despite my mother coming from South Wales and Maria in Witch from the mountains to the west of Valencia, they both end up in London and die prematurely from a heroin overdose. The style of the books is rather different but thematically they are very much linked but with the crucial different that in the earlier one an interest in drugs and expanded states of of consciousness are linked in a way they are not in the more recent novel.

B. Paradoxically, drug usage was utilised by the authorities to justify repression and abuse. The toughest parts of the novel are those in which police officers appear.

H. It was very hard to get out of my mother’s friends how badly she was abused by the police. Terry Taylor had left London and wasn’t in regular touch with her when that was happening, so I had to get it from other people. In Tainted Love I’m recording what I dragged out of people since they weren’t too willing to tell me. But I don’t think that level of abuse will surprise anyone whose been at the sharp end of London policing. Strangely at the end of September 2020 one of the most notorious of the bent coppers as far as the London counterculture goes, Norman Pilcher, put his name to a book called Bent Coppers: The Story of The Man Who Arrested John Lennon, George Harrison and Brian Jones, I haven’t bothered to read it because while he tells of corruption all around him, he now claims he wasn’t involved in it, which is a blatant lie. Nearly 20 years ago I asked to speak to one ex-cop who’d lodged a blatantly false report about my mother. He refused to talk to me but I hope I made this retired thug feel uncomfortable. I would have done the same for others if I could have got hold of them. I assume they’re mostly dead now.

B. Tainted Love was published over 15 years ago. Do you think the sixties still have something to teach us?

H. Every age has something to teach us, so of course the sixties does too. As Marx famously said: “Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living.”

Interview by Alejandro Alvarfer. A slightly shortened version of this interview can be found in issue 7 of Bruxismo which at the time I of posting it here was still available for sale from the following link. https://colectivobruxista.es/producto/bruxismo7/?v=a33c1ea972fc

Tuesday, 20 August 2019

Lee Holmes of Clones of Bruce Lee is Stupid


A reply to the baseless accusations of Lee Holmes of Clones of Bruce Lee.


I’ve no wish to draw others into your attempt to create a spat, so I will not bother to cover all the issues raised by your brickbat on pages I do not run regardless of how obsessively you repost your rant on social media. Here no one else need be involved, unless they chose to involve themselves. So let’s go through your preposterous claims. You write:

“I must say I am pretty annoyed at the reference to me in the book. The author seems to be obsessed with trying to put down other writers who have delved into this genre in some sort of attempt to make himself out as the more superior researcher.”

Here’s most of what I have to say about you: “Within Brucesploitation and the related Chansploitation phenomena, actors who copy and clone Bruce Lee or Jackie Chan make up one strand of these subgenres, but their importance can and has been over-stated. This is evident not just from the title of the book Here Come The Kung Fu Clones by Carl Jones, but also the UK fan site Clones of Bruce Lee run by Lee Holmes. Both Jones and Holmes treat Bruce Liang as a clone. My own view is that when Liang appears as Bruce Lee in The Dragon Lives Again (1977) he is there as an actor playing the Little Dragon in the underworld after death rather than a clone; this is emphasised by dialogue in the English dub addressing head on the fact that Liang doesn’t look like Bruce Lee…. Movies such as The Black Dragon’s Revenge (1975), with a narrative that revolves around a fictional investigation into the death of Bruce Lee, belong to the Brucesploitation genre without even featuring a clone so copyists are not essential to this film category. Lee Holmes on his Clones website at one time listed Black Dragon’s Revenge supporting actor Charles Bonet as a Bruce Lee clone, but given this martial artist’s karate leanings and rejection of kung fu, this is not a claim I take at all seriously. I would further argue that those who see figures like Bonet as clones do so because they approach Brucesploitation in thrall to the misleading idea that copyists define it. Tadashi Yamashita, sometimes called Bronson Lee after a character he played, is another example of a karateka I do not accept as a Bruce Lee clone; despite Jones and Holmes – among others – mistakenly asserting he is one.”

Seeing this any intelligent reader will immediately realise that your claim that I want to pose as “the more superior researcher” is based on a basic category error.  The passage above is focused more on interpretation than research and I certainly wouldn’t damn myself with feint praise by claiming to be a superior theorist to you because you are not a theorist at all. Likewise your clumsy attempt at commentary on something you failed to fully understand might be cited as evidence that I am a superior writer to you; sadly your prose as quoted in the present paragraph is so clunky that this hardly requires pointing out. While I may be putting you down now for a ridiculously over-sensitive and stupid response to Re-Enter The Dragon, this was not what I was doing in the book when I laid out the differences between my positions on Brucesploitation as a genre and dominant discourse on it to date, of which your website simply provides an example. If you don’t want your views of Brucesploitation to be met with anything other than agreement then you’d be best advised not to air them in public, or indeed private.

You write: “…who doesn't think that Fist of Unicorn should be categorised as Bruceploitation? This not some big revelation.”

Newsflash for Lee Holmes, billions of people in the world have never heard of Fist of Unicorn or Brucesploitation, and it is therefore extremely unlikely they think a film of which they are unaware should be categorised as part of a genre they aren’t familiar with. However if you look at what I say in regard to this in context then it is also obvious that I’m not claiming this as some ‘big revelation’ but rather deploying it as part of a broader argument: “I have seen it falsely asserted in a number of places – including Wikipedia – that Brucesploitation movies attempted to exploit interest in Bruce Lee after his death. Fist of Unicorn (1973) can and should be treated as part of the genre, and it was made and released before Lee died on 20 July 1973…” In case you want to check the Wikipedia entry, although it appears you don’t bother to fact check anything very much (see below), there is an archived version of the page here: https://web.archive.org/web/20181102091239/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruceploitation

Incidentally if you think Fist of Unicorn is Brucesploitation then you implicitly support my argument that the genre predates the Little Dragon’s death, and Wikipedia - among others – was wrong to claim it is made up of movies shot after 20 July 1973. Note that this Wikipedia entry opens with various errors I am attempting to correct in Re-Enter The Dragon: “Bruceploitation (a portmanteau of Bruce Lee and exploitation) refers to the practice on the part of filmmakers in mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan of hiring Bruce Lee look-alike actors ("Lee-alikes") to star in many imitation martial arts films in order to cash in on Lee's success after his death.” Alongside the dating error in this opening sentence, there are the misleading assertions that Brucesploitation is characterised by look-alike actors (or clones to use the term found in the title of your website) and about the geographical areas that produced such films (which, of course, also include The Philippines, Korea, Indonesia, Japan and the USA). The claim that Brucesploitation movies are ‘imitation martial arts films’ is particularly silly; in my experience most of those interested in the genre currently consider them to be actual martial arts films rather than imitation fight flicks. That said, such a slippage does serve to illustrate the damage the clone fallacy does to a proper understanding of the genre.

Wikipedia entries are highly ranked by search engines and are influential, therefore misconceptions within them and the sources they draw upon and link to – including in the instance of the one on ‘Bruceploitation’ your website - need to be challenged, which is what I’ve been doing. I would also point out that this Wikipedia entry has for some time contained a link to a review of the Carl Jones book Here Come The Kung Fu Clones that I wrote and published in 2012, and that my understanding of Brucesploitation has changed since then; although I would stand by the review’s premise that Jones in his book was confused about the Bruce Le filmography - this is reiterated in less detail in Re-Enter The Dragon.

You say: “I also don't think anyone has ever said that Bruce Lee A Dragon Story is the first Bruceploitation movie, it is the first Bruce Lee Bio-pic.”

The top two entries of the web search I just did for Bruce Lee: A Dragon Story (1974), both addressed the matter of it being the ‘first’ Brucesploitation movie. I got live links for Wikipedia and Hong Kong Movie Database but I’m providing archived ones here:

Bruce Lee: A Dragon Story… is a 1974 Bruceploitation film starring Bruce Li…. The film is notable for being the first biopic of Bruce Lee (it was released the year following his death), the debut film of notorious Lee imitator Bruce Li, and the first film in the Bruceploitation genre.
“Bruce Lee: A Dragon Story is thought to be the first entry in the extraordinary genre of what are known as "Brucesploitation" films.” https://web.archive.org/web/20120710022900/http://hkmdb.com/db/movies/reviews.mhtml?id=9646&display_set=eng

You say: “…how do you know my opinions on Bruce Leung Siu-Lung or Tadashi Yamashita and how they fit into Bruceploitation? I've never published a profile on them on my site. If you wanted my opinion on them, here is a radical idea, you could have just asked me!”

I assume it is narcissism that makes you think I’d be interested in your opinions. To clarify, I couldn’t give a flying fuck about your opinions on Bruce Liang (AKA Bruce Leung Siu-Lung), Tadashi Yamashita, or anything else for that matter. My book dealt with Brucesploitation as a genre and that meant I needed to address the discourse(s) that create and shape it, and unfortunately your website is a part of this and is publicly accessible. On your site you have a page dedicated to ‘lesser known stars of Bruceploitation’, where you mention three major clones and go on to provide a list of others who were ‘impersonating The Little Dragon’. You include both Bruce Liang (AKA Bruce Leung Siu-Lung) and Tadashi Yamashita on this list and therefore effectively treat them as clones. It would have been completely redundant to ask you about this because you’d already implicitly stated your position online. In case you’ve forgotten what’s on your own website here’s an archived version of the page: https://web.archive.org/web/20190819111923/http://clonesofbrucelee.info/enter-another-dragon/

You say: “And why would anyone classify Mission Terminate as a Bruceploitation movie? It is only included on my site due to the fact that it features Bruce Le and I cover his entire filmography.”

If you cover Bruce Le’s entire filmography why am I unable to find coverage of it all on your site? For example I can find nothing about Treasure of Bruce Lee or My Name Called Bruce. When I use the search engine on your site for these films it produces no results, see screenshots below. It’s claims like this, which I’m unable to substantiate, that lead me to suspect you may be a habitual liar. Since I’ve never been able to find coverage of ALL Bruce Le’s films on your site, your sorry justification isn’t exactly convincing. There’s nothing on the page containing the Richard Norton interview to suggest you see Mission Terminate as anything other than Brucesploitation. That page is archived here: https://web.archive.org/web/20190819112551/http://clonesofbrucelee.info/richard-norton/

Your homepage explicitly states: “This website is dedicated to Bruce Lee exploitation cinema, or ‘Bruceploitation’ as it has become to be known.” This is at the top of the page in capital letters and it is therefore reasonable for anyone visiting the site to conclude that anything on it - such as the coverage of Mission Terminate - you consider to be Brucesploitation, unless you explicitly state otherwise. BTW: your sentence construction is shockingly bad and you really ought to rewrite the dreadful ‘as it has become to be known’ since this sloppy phrasing is very visible on the page.  In case you’ve forgotten what’s on your homepage there’s an archived version of it here: https://web.archive.org/web/20190209093714/http://clonesofbrucelee.info/

You write: “I applaud anyone who goes to the effort to bring out a book on this genre that I love I just don't see why you think you had to include my name, and other writers (e.g. Carl Jones) in such a negative way to try make yourself and your book look better. As a fan and researcher of this genre for more than 30 years I wouldn't see the need to try and put down you in anything I write. My research into the genre consists of more than merely watching what i can find online or purchased from the poundshop and writing a basic plot line and sticking it in a book.”

This self-refuting passage really made me laugh. You are attempting to put me down in your brickbat, and it is something you’ve written, so why pointlessly contradict yourself within it by rhetorically stating: “I wouldn't see the need to try and put down you in anything I write…” You appear incapable of making or sustaining a coherent argument or writing a well-constructed sentence. Likewise some of the absurd errors on your part addressed here rather belie your claims to have been researching ‘this genre for more than 30 years’. It would appear that what you call ‘research’ consists mostly of spouting the first piece bullshit that enters your head and deluding yourself into thinking no one will notice you’re utterly clueless. Likewise your claim that me ‘putting you down’ will make me or my book ‘look better’ is ridiculous, since you’re a complete twit who is utterly incapable of making me or anyone else ‘look better’ by comparison. I also hope it’s clear by now I wasn’t putting you down in my book even if I am now. I’m doing that here to demonstrate the difference between civil critical engagement with your website – which is my stance towards it in Re-Enter The Dragon – and personalised refutation with humorous insults, which as I trust this reply illustrates is a style of address that I am also familiar with and that I can deploy as and when is necessary. It would be great if this eventually helped you to understand the difference between the two, although at present that seems rather unlikely.

You say: “And one final thought, I've never seen Bruceploitation spelt "Brucesploitation". I've no idea where you got that idea from.”

I discuss the variant spellings of Brucesploitation in Re-Enter The Dragon and if as you claim you’ve been researching the genre for 30 years then you really ought to have seen the spelling I use elsewhere. Either you’re lying or you haven’t done any serious research, or both. I’m going to give you one example of the Brucesploitation spelling being used here but you can find many more by doing a simple web search, assuming - of course - you’re not too simple to use a search engine: https://www.grindhousedatabase.com/index.php/Brucesploitation



-->

Sunday, 11 May 2014

Witches’ Brew : Brian Hamill interviews Stewart Home, August 2020

Hi Stewart – you’ve been involved in the arts world in various ways for decades now, there’s just so much that could be asked, about Neoism, about the Situationists, the Art Strike, the Necrocard hoax, the reactions of far-right Russian groups to your work, your family history, your non-fiction writing on politics, art, psychogeography, cinema, and more … but as an imprint that’s concerned primarily with literature, my intention is to focus on the fiction, and in particular your new novel She’s My Witch (although I have added some interesting links at the bottom of this piece, related to some of the aforementioned things). So …  Your new novel, She’s My Witch, focuses on the developing relationship between Martin, a fitness instructor, and Maria, someone who edits videos, uses heroin, and considers herself to be a witch. Maria is an entrancing character, mysterious and passionate. Have you known people who practise witchcraft? How did this operate within their daily lives, and how true to this reality is Maria? 


SH: Given the prevalence of witchcraft today I’d have thought you’d have to be pretty cut off from society not to know women involved with it, and maybe some men too. That said, the acquaintances most people will have who are involved with witchcraft probably won’t tell those they think will be judgemental about it, so some won’t know how widespread the practice is. It used to take a while for people to open up and tell me they were witches but especially since I made the visual piece Occult Androgyny which I showed as part of Glasgow International in 2016 and subsequently elsewhere, some women who’ve seen that work will introduce themselves to me so that they can talk about their involvement in witchcraft.


There are often tell-tale signs someone you know is a witch. They will often speak about their interest in astrology, tarot or their psychic powers. An even bigger clue would be if someone told me their new girlfriend was collecting their hair and nail clippings. In She’s My Witch, Martin doesn’t fully understand how Maria is utilising magic to control and seduce him, some of that is left to the reader to figure out. For example, Martin talks about how sweet Maria is cleaning him up with tissues after he’s come, but at least some of those familiar with magick will figure out she’s harvesting his sperm to use in spells and rituals to bind him to her, just as she might use his hair, nail clippings or blood.


My initial plan when writing the book was to keep things simple by having Maria pretty much stick to folk belief and Wicca when it came to witchcraft. In the past I’ve had good friends who were very straightforward Wiccans but most of the witches I hang out with these days are post-Wiccan. They believe the world has changed since Gerald Gardener laid out his system and so magic needs to change too. I was hanging out with post-Wiccans when I was writing the book and re-reading it recently I realised rather more of their approach to witchcraft has seeped into its pages than I intended. But I’m happy with that because it adds to Maria’s complexity.


The witches I know have the same problems as everyone else, making enough money to pay their rent, health issues, sometimes even addictions of the type Maria suffers from. What makes them stand out from other people is that they tend to be much more imaginative. Some might say that they haven’t lost touch with their childhood personalities but I take a longer historical view of the matter. If you understand a future global communist society as a return at a higher level of primitive communism encompassing both the social organisation and the modes of consciousness of human tribes before the emergence of class divisions, then witchcraft is very much a harbinger of revolutionary changes to come. From a communist perspective, shamanism was very much a reaction against and resistance to the emergence of class society.


Returning to the witches I know, they might ask me to participate in a ritual, since often more than one person is required and not just in the many forms of sex magic - although there are solo forms of that too - they practice. Unsurprisingly among witches who are open with me about their beliefs there are often spontaneous manifestations of their creed. Sometimes I’ll be walking down the street with a witch and she’ll say did you just see that ghost who went past us? Or else we’ll be in a park and the witch I’m with might see a tree and say look at how twisted that trunk is, there’s a lot of energy coming up from that tree, we have to walk clockwise around it. So we’ll walk clockwise around it, spaced so that we can’t see each other because we’re each on opposite sides of the tree. This is how the witches I know behave and to a large extent how I had Maria behave in the book. It isn’t so different from the practices of other people I know, mainly men, who call themselves psychogeographers or even surrealists. Bearing that in mind, among many other things I see She’s My Witch as correcting at least sone of the patriarchal and other ideological faults of Andre Breton’s novel Nadja.


Likewise, Martin isn’t really very far removed from witchcraft with his sports science. Exercise is very much a ritual involving a lot of repetitive moves and sports people talk about going into the zone. The zone is an altered form of consciousness not dissimilar to those you get from practicing witchcraft and it also relates to the experience of subspace in BDSM. As well as witches, I have quite a few friends who are personal trainers but I haven’t yet come across anyone who is both as long as yoga teachers are discounted. So Martin accurately reflects the life of a personal trainer, although most personal trainers I know have at least one or two regular gym classes a week alongside individual clients. I didn’t give Martin regular gym classes because I wanted pauses in the physical relationship between him and Maria in order to move more quickly and easily through the three and a half year time frame I was covering. Providing Martin with very rich clients who wanted him to go abroad with them regularly enabled me to put that in place. Some trainers I know have been taken abroad by their wealthy clients, but not to the extent Martin goes on trips with his in my novel, and this would have been more tricky if he’d had regular gym classes to teach.


Both Martin and Maria reflect the social realities of people I know who lived in London in the period I’m writing about, 2011 to 2014. I’ve had plenty of friends with drug addictions like Maria. I also have friends who work as professional dominatrixes and recently I’ve been working on cultural projects with femdom artist and suspension bondage mistress Itziar Bilbao Urrutia. We should have had an exhibition together in London called Sexus Maleficarum in April but it was delayed by the pandemic. An online version of it will appear soon via the Hackney based Darling Pearls & Co Gallery.


2 So much of Maria’s thoughts and aspirations is related to her belief in Martin being her ‘psychic twin’, and the potential for them to use sex and domination to take them towards forming a kind of hermaphrodite entity together. She constantly speaks of reincarnation and predestination, yet her drug use often impedes this life with Martin. Was this important for the novel – to ground spirituality and mysticism within contemporary reality and the flaws & limitations of ordinary people?


SH: Witches and dominatrixes - and Maria in the novel has been both - have all these fantasies projected onto them by others, most usually men, who want to believe they spend all their time either naked doing sex magic or dressed from head to toe in latex while beating their subs. If you stop and think about it, then it’s obvious that both witches and dominatrixes spend most of their time doing the same things as everyone else, sleeping, eating, cooking, cleaning, watching TV etc. There are only ordinary people in this world and the main reality we experience is the contemporary and impoverishing one of capitalism. So I wanted Maria and Martin to have lots of flaws to reflect this reality. I didn’t want anyone not already active in a coven or whatever reading the book and thinking that spirituality and mysticism are something that only supposedly ‘superior’ people engage with. If you think of witchcraft as being about altered modes of consciousness then that’s something we all need to get into in order to extract ourselves from the shit storm that is our contemporary world.


The dominatrixes I know spend far more time doing DIY than tying up up submissive men and pegging them. Likewise the witches to be found among my friends are probably as involved in community struggles against gentrification as occult rituals, and sometimes both at once. A few years ago I mentioned to a friend that I was going to hex a local ghost flat development as a stunt to get some press coverage of opposition to it. She asked if I had a coven involved and when I said no she told me that wasn’t good enough and that if I was going to hex luxury flats and other neo-liberal property developments I had to do it for real and not just as a stunt When I told this activist friend about my plan I didn’t even know she was a witch, but she got her coven to create a cone of power as we did the demo. There’s a video version of the event including some TV coverage of it here on my YouTube channel: <https://youtu.be/nYMQiBlY4eg>


3 I don’t think I’ve read another book that has utilised social media in such a straightforward (yet creative) way. Much of the novel is a dialogue taking place via Facebook messages, yet it’s clear from how this form is used that it enables certain textual effects – there is very little explaining shifts in time to the reader, very little mundane narration – it’s as if their worlds only really exist in relation to each other, the story is only happening when they are in contact. Is She’s My Witch partly an exploration of how different mediums can shape personalities and relationships? Do you think it’s naïve for writers to still ignore social media in their fiction?


SH: I’ve never really liked the bourgeois literary novel that emerged in its perfected form in the nineteenth-century and whose greatest exponents were the likes of Dickens, Austen and Hardy. Modernism broke with that tradition but then eighteenth-century and earlier literature that pre-dates the perfected bourgeois novel can also become a vehicle for moving on and away from it. So I was thinking dialectically about detouring from the bourgeois novel when I was planning She’s My Witch. You could see my new book as continuing and expanding a trajectory of epistolary novels like Pamela, Clarissa and The History of Sir Charles Grandison all by Samuel Richardson, or the equally problematic Aline et Valcour by the Maquis de Sade. Given I was writing a 21st century novel a lot of the communication was inevitably by social media. The speed of that medium does shape the relationship between Maria and Martin, and their love affair transforms them both.


I started work on the book in the summer of 2014 which is why I decided to end the narrative then. However there were a lot of interruptions and distractions, including editing the last two novels in the Semina experimental fiction series I did for Book Works. Anyway in 2016 Iphgenia Baal came to me with Merced Es Benz. It was a dream for me to edit this manuscript because it had some similarities to She’s My Witch in that there were a lot of social media and text message exchanges, in the first draft I saw these were mixed with journal entries. Merced Es Benz is also a relationship story but in this instance it’s the male who has the drug issues and the central characters are younger than mine and from much wealthier social backgrounds. Their love affair is also more dysfunctional than Martin and Maria’s.


I sent the first draft I saw back to Iphgenia saying cut the journal stuff completely or break it up more, and figure out how much of the time and date and other header info you want on the social media messages. I also had something to say about the timeline. I didn’t need to say much because Iphgenia is a great writer and a very good editor of her own work. A much improved draft came back and after that we went through a couple more with me not having to say much and Iphgenia doing all the hard graft. Being the editor on Merced Es Benz really helped clarify my ideas for She’s My Witch, which in its first draft was far too long, it was considerably more than twice the length of the published book.


Basically I did with my own book what I encouraged Iphgenia to do with hers, cut it back. My own Semina series novel Blood Rites of the Bourgeoisie was published in 2010 and also deployed  social media messaging as a narrative technique, alongside modified email spam. As an aside, HOE# 999: Decennial Appreciation and Celebratory Analysis by Jarett Kobek - which also appeared in my Semina series in 2010 - explores the online culture that immediately preceded social media. Jarett generated the text for this book by sending his own teenage textfiles - the electronic equivalent of fanzines - to an essay farm for appraisal and he then added editorial commentary of his own too. I’m not really sure why more writers don’t use social media within their fiction when its such a big part of most people’s lives now. Three of the nine books in the Semina series I commissioned and edited for Book Works - including my own - had a major online element. I’d have probably included more if any others had been submitted but out of about a thousand applications in total to my open submission calls, I don’t remember any others that dealt with the online world.


The web has transformed the world in many ways and to focus in on one example, it has revolutionised our sex lives.  It’s now possible to explore online all sorts of sexual practices that were unknown or inaccessible to many before the rise of social media. I’ve tried to illustrate that with a story I’ve just written for your The Middle Of A Sentence anthology called A Hypno Kink Princess. There wouldn’t have been the on and offline explosion of erotic hypnotism in recent years without social media and in particular video platforms and camming. Hypno kink is just one of many examples of ‘niche’ sexual interests in this area we could explore. I find Hypno kink particularly curious both because of the way it can be combined with so many different BDSM activities and because of how many sex platforms and camming sites ban it.


I’m dealing obliquely with the consent issues related to hypno kink in She’s My Witch. Although Martin certainly doesn’t realise the extent to which Maria is using both witchcraft and psychology to seduce him, I trust most readers will see past his blind spots on this because there are plenty of clues that Maria is interested in the practical application of psychology and mind control in order to improve her daily life and cement her relationship with Martin. That said, while lots of people are attracted to such techniques and books on pop psychology are often bestsellers, how effective such tricks actually are is open to debate. We’re talking about everything here from How To Win Friends And Influence People through to army psy-ops manuals like General Sir Frank Kitson’s Low Intensity Operations.


I’d like to stress that when Maria applies these psychological tricks and mind control techniques to Martin her intention is to promote love and happiness for both of them. While Maria wants to bind Martin to her so that he’ll surrender his gender, she does this out of love and wants her ‘psychic twin’ to be happy. Likewise, Martin also uses deception at times. Knowing Maria is habitually late, when they need to meet at Euston station to catch a train he tells her the departure time is earlier than it actually is, to ensure she’s there when he needs her to be there.


4 On page 111 of the novel, Maria says: “It isn’t that I hate politics, I just know that if I involved myself with the issues of the day I’d end up becoming a terrorist out of my frustration at the way the world is”, and at another point, she refers to herself as “radically apolitical”. Do you consider this as a valid position to take? Why do you think Maria feels this and is her disavowal a form of her weakness or a meaningful alternative to participation in this political system?


SH: Maria’s responses are valid from an emotional perspective and human beings are emotional as well as rational. That said, in this world everything is political so you can’t really avoid politics but abstentionism has also been a tactic of the communist left. However, Maria is advocating abstentionism as a means of survival and not as part of a communist programme aimed at human emancipation. She has an occult programme for that, which does ultimately link up with the communist programme, as Martin points out a few times in the novel. If you mentioned Amadeo Bordiga to Maria she wouldn’t know who or what you were talking about and certainly wouldn’t be familiar with, for example, the Theses of the Abstentionist Communist Faction of the Italian Socialist Party of 1920 ((it isn’t likely Martin would know these either). Likewise the terrorism Maria says she would fall into if she involved herself in politics is vanguardist and not something that would attract consideration from someone committed to the programme of the communist left. Nonetheless I don’t see this advocacy of non-participation as a weakness on Maria’s part - striking is also a form of non-participation - all things considered it is probably a better response to capitalism than the nihilistic and romantic gestural politics she very consciously understands attract her but that she’s rejected. She may not be a perfect anti-capitalist - who is? - but with her witchcraft and animal rights stands she’s a better one than she would be if she involved herself in a terrorist group.


5 I believe it’s fair to say two of the defining features of your fiction have been an intentional lack of character development (in a great interview I read from 1994, you called your characters “cardboard cut-outs”), and the prevalence of purposefully sterile and repetitive sex scenes (being adapted from and playing on pulp novels of the 1970’s). It seems to me that in She’s My Witch (and some of your other books since the turn of the century) that whereas the sex scenes have persisted, you have started to place more importance on characterisation. Martin’s detached and delusional passivity frustrated me, and Maria is so far from a ‘cut-out’… or am I reading too much into them? Has your position on this changed across your writing career?


SH: I think my writing has evolved in different ways at different times. The style I initially became known for begins with the short stories that were later anthologised alongside other stuff in the No Pity collection. These took off from British youth culture pulp fiction but with this material re-read through the prism of 20th century modernism and post-modernism, and in particular Alain Robbe-Grillet, but refracted especially through Jean Baudrillard’s post-modern theoretical writings on simulation. So whereas surrealist and nouveau roman writers incorporated elements of pulp prose into their highbrow constructions, I wanted to simulate the pulp novel by taking the type of repetition you find in the work of lowbrow genre hacks spread across many books and hundreds of thousands of words but collapse that into a single work of around sixty thousand words. This meant repeating words and phrases, particularly those associated with sex and violence - and indeed whole scenes of sex and violence - in a single book rather than across books.


My intransigent use of repetition was intended to deconstruct the pulp narratives I was plundering. I wrote five novels in the third person in this style, Pure Mania, Defiant Pose, Red London, Blow Job and Slow Death. The middle three I consider to be a conceptual trilogy about the limitations of ideological extremism, because - among other things - such extremism is relational and not rational. These are the novels in which I wanted the ciphers who populated them to be cardboard cut-outs rather than characters. It would have been funny to carry on producing pretty much the same book almost indefinitely and infinitely but I chose not to do so. Come Before Christ & Murder Love, the sixth novel I wrote - the books weren’t published in the order I wrote them - was narrated in a non-linear fashion and in the first person by a schizophrenic whom became a different character every time he had an orgasm. The occult and mind control elements of this book are reprised in some of my later novels including She’s My Witch. Although characterisation wasn’t important to Come Before Christ, neither did it feature a cardboard cut-out narrator since schizophrenia - even if it is only being simulated - produces something more complex than that.


The first book I produced in which character is important is my eleventh novel Tainted Love, which is a fictionalised version of my mother’s life in which she’s called Jilly rather than Julia. Jilly narrates it in the first person, Jilly, like Maria in She’s My Witch, is deeply immersed in mysticism, is addicted to heroin and makes money as a sex worker. Jilly - like my mother - was born in the mid-1940s in South Wales, whereas Maria is born in outside Valencia in the late-1960s. So each of these two novels is focused on a woman with a very similar trajectory but a generation apart. Thus while Jilly gets into Subud and then Hindu gurus, Maria involves herself in witchcraft. Jilly is a beatnik-cum-hippie, Maria a punk rocker. Jilly is a high-class hostess, Maria a dominatrix. Both end up in London and both are complex characters.


I’m still proud of my earlier books but they were short and comic and in the third person. I intended them to be cartoon like. Characterisation isn’t crucial to all my mostly first person novels written between the later 1990s and now, but I’m not a pulp novelist and it isn’t realistic to expect my sixteenth novel to work strictly with the same ideas as the first - especially considering there’s a gap of 31 years separating their respective publications! She’s My Witch is more or less twice as long as each of my first five novels so just that extra length on its own would force changes of emphasis and structure. 


I didn’t want Maria to be a cardboard cut out. She’s the central subject of She’s My Witch and that’s one of the reasons why Martin is more detached, to move attention away from him despite the fact he’s the narrator. Maria is charming and intelligent but her plans and schemes are continually sabotaged by her addictions. She’s a complex character with an extraordinary backstory and She’s My Witch is in some ways the tale of her brave struggle to deal with and get over the trauma of being raped by a stranger as a small child. But at the same time she is so much more than a victim of abuse.


Maria has very intentionally set out to seduce and mesmerise Martin. He never realises the lengths Maria has gone to in her efforts to bind him to her, even when at the end of the book he learns she’s printed out and preserved all their social media conversations. I wouldn’t say Martin is delusional, just deeply in love with Maria and to bust out that old cliche - and I love cliches - love is blind. Maria has more cunning than Martin, and he doesn’t quite share her deep feminine belief in the power of education and knowledge.


To conclude the issue, you’re absolutely right to think what I had to say about my earlier novels doesn’t apply to some of the more recent ones! As Gene October sang on the second Chelsea single High Rise Living back in 1977, ‘times change and we change too…”


6 I’m aware that sound is very important to you as a writer – both the sound for the reader as they absorb the words within themselves, and for your own vocal recitals of your work. Was this again a significant part of the creation of She’s My Witch? Did you vocalize sections of the book as you wrote in order to arrive at the right expression for each of the voices?


SH: Yes. I always subvocalise everything, fiction, non-fiction, it doesn’t matter, I’m obsessed with sound, so I can’\t stop myself doing it and I wouldn’t want to in any case. There are a lot of well regarded literary writers who I can’t stand because you can tell they don’t care how what they write sounds, it’s just there, flat on the page. In terms of She’s My Witch, Martin’s voice was easy, it was just my standard fairly blank male narrator but Maria was more difficult. She was a working class woman who’d learned English after arriving in London as an adult. Clearly if I was going to make her speech realistic it was going to be heavily accented and contain lots of Spanish language grammatical constructions. To me that didn’t read well so I went for good English rather than realism, with the odd Spanish word or phrase thrown in here and there.


7 I think many people who write (myself included) are subject to the ‘anxiety of influence’, and shy away from ever consciously writing in a style similar to the artists they love. It was refreshing and even exciting when I first saw you speak quite passionately about allowing sequences of writing by Ann Quin or certain song rhythms and lyrics to filter into your work. I’ve seen you cite Beckett, Trocchi, Burroughs, Robbe-Grillet as artists whose work you admire. Were there any conscious influences at play in the prose of She’s My Witch? I read recently that Beckett stopped reading Kafka’s The Castle because he was worried about it impacting upon his fiction – do you understand that impulse, or will you always embrace such influences?


SH: I’m always happy to invite other writing and writers into my texts, it makes my work richer and even more intertextual. However with She’s My Witch I wasn’t particularly drawing on other books. Of course, like many of my novels the title of She’s My Witch comes from a song, in this case Kip Tyler’s 1958 rockabilly classic of that name. But in the past I’ve done much more than just use song titles, I’ll quite happily lift whole passages and even more from other people’s works and place them in my own books. Given that collage and bricolage are such a huge element of modernist and post-modern culture, it seems like it’s been the most sensible way to approach writing for well over a hundred years. And of course it isn’t just me who does this, for example, Kathy Acker was also famous for it. My ninth novel Whips & Furs was a detourned work with a structure based on Alex Trocchi’s faked fifth volume of Frank Harris’s My Life & Loves. I plundered much of the content from Grant Allen’s Victorian detective work An African Millionaire, but cut it with Victorian porn in the form of The Lustful Turk. These earlier works were then re-written to be the true story of Jesus Christ. I thought that one was better than The Bible!


To give a very different example of absorbing influence, my fifteenth novel The 9 Lives Of Ray The Cat Jones is based on the criminal career of my mother’s cousin and told in the fictional first person by him. For me it was a vehicle to explore the true crime genre and I read hundreds of such books to get the tone right, although I wasn’t literally plundering them to use as text. Ray Jones came up to London from South Wales before World War II and was a cat burglar but his best known escapade was a successful escape from Pentonville Prison in 1958. While character is important in this book, as I’ve indicated what I also wanted to do was explore the fictional nature and ideological construction of the often ghosted criminal autobiographies that have been popular for hundreds of years, from the Elizabethan cony-catching pamphlet on down. Although I call 9 Lives a novel, it is probably a good deal less fictional than many of the supposedly non-fictional ghosted books in the genre it is deconstructing. It also stands out among my novels for being almost entirely bereft of sex scenes but then that reflects an overall trend in the genre it was mimicking.


I don’t really understand why anyone would subject themselves to anxieties about influence. When I’m training for sports I watch what other people do and incorporate it into my routines, so why not do the same with writing? For me it’s the ultimate result that matters not how this is achieved. It just seems really pointless to be hung up on not letting others give you a leg up with your writing and wanting to be ‘original’. Of course anyone genuinely original won’t be understood coz they’ll have to make up a whole new language - they wouldn’t be writing in English or Spanish or whatever language they happened to speaking growing up. There seems to be less anxiety about influence in the worlds of art and popular culture than the literary world.


8 In an interview in 2006, you said the following with reference to your novel, ‘69 Things To Do With A Dead Princess’: “Dead Princess sells because people who grew up on fifties and sixties experimental writing (a lot of whom weren’t born until the sixties and even seventies) aren’t at all well served by the publishing industry these days … There is still a lot of interest in non-narrative literary explorations, but most publishers just won’t cater for it. Therefore if you can sneak a book into print that doesn’t patronise the reader, doesn’t assume they are thick, then despite the fact that according to the those running publishing houses it is ‘uncommercial’, it is potentially an extremely commercial proposition, if it’s well done – and Dead Princess is very well done – because there is absolutely no contemporary competition.” Do you think this situation has changed at all in the fourteen years since? Is there still the same interest in non-narrative literary explorations? Are the people interested in experimental writing still not being well served? Or do you feel there are more experimental writers in that 50’s/60’s mould at work now, and more publishers open to such books?


SH: I think publishing has changed massively since Dead Princess came out. All book titles across the board - with a tiny handful of exceptions - sell less and there are far more titles being published. Alongside social media, podcasts and platforms such as Netflix, print on demand, eBooks and bootleg pdfs have changed everything. The words you quote from me come from a different era and don’t apply to today. Since I said that we’ve seen a massive revival of Ann Quin, which is great because I’ve loved her writing since I was a teen - and there are a lot more people writing in experimental ways getting published on micro-imprints today. So the interest in new modes of writing is still there but the major publishers aren’t going to cater for it. The big publishers have become more conservative and even more irrelevant. There is more interesting writing about now but it’s not going to be found in the shrinking ‘mainstream’. In terms of contemporary culture, the gatekeepers really don’t matter much any more, since virtually everything now exists beyond the gates they guard and there’s nothing but a wasteland behind them.


9 You were the Creative Writing Fellow at Strathclyde Uni the year after I had left (2006). How was that experience? As someone who has always lived in the great city of London, what was your impression of Glasgow? Did you come to know more Scottish writers and more about the literature of Glasgow when you were here?


SH: I first visited Glasgow in 1985 and was impressed to see a Ralph Rumney show at Transmissions Gallery, since this was his first one person exhibition in about 25 years, his previous one had been before I was born! At that time I was deeply interested in him and his work. Soon after I developed friendships with several members of the Transmission board of the time - especially Jayne Taylor, Carol Rhodes, Malcolm Dickson, Gordon Muir and and Billy Clarke. I did shows and events at Transmission sporadically from 1987 onwards. From the mid-eighties on I made a lot of friends in Glasgow and spent a lot of time there.


A lot of scenes in Glasgow at that time intersected and my initial contact with people in Glasgow was through the libertarian communist magazine Here & Now, and then the art magazine Variant. These scenes crossed over in things like the Glasgow Free University and the Edinburgh Review Encyclopedia group; I was more involved with the latter because it would meet in London and also had strong connections to Glasgow despite its name. In the 1990s I retained these contacts but also became close to groups like the Workshop for a Non-Linear Architecture, who had a section in Glasgow. More recently I’ve been lucky enough to work with the wonderful Queens Park Railway Club and did a solo show there called Re-Enter The Dragon for Glasgow International. Much of the research work on that show formed the basis for the non-fiction book I published with Ledatape in 2018 called Re-Enter The Dragon: Genre Theory, Brucesploitation and the Sleazy Joys of Lowbrow Cinema. As already mentioned, as part of my Glasgow International show at Queens Park I also included a morph series entitled Occult Androgyny.


I already knew a lot of Glasgow writers before I did the writer-in-residence at Strathclyde. Peter Kravitz who signed my first novel to the Edinburgh publisher Polygon in 1988 (it was published the following year) lived in Glasgow then and was possibly the first person to introduce me to the likes of Tom Leonard and James Kelman, although I only ever met them down the pub at that time. The drinker was generally one in Woodlands Road or somewhere nearby. Carol Rhodes was for a time lodging with Alasdair Gray, doing part time secretarial work for him as well as her own painting and her many activist pursuits, so I got to see him in his home environment. I did once stay with Carol but that wasn’t when she was lodging with Gray,


in the eighties I most often used to stay with artist Jayne Taylor in Charring X. I’d read her Glasgow books when I was at her flat. If I didn’t finish them she’d let me take them away and return them next time I saw her, I definitely read her copy of A Glasgow Gang Observed by James Patrick when that book was hard to find, and while it was easier to pick up I may have read Jayne’s copy of the Gorbals novel No Mean City by H. Kingsley Long and Alexander McArthur. Back then she lived right next to the Mitchell Library, so I could also pop in there and look at stuff. More recently when I’ve been in Glasgow I’ve tended to stay with the DJ Guy Veale, and he hosted me in his west end flat when I was doing the writer-in-residence at Strathclyde - but many other people have put me up in Glasgow over the years including the artist Kenny Murphy-Roud and activist Keith Millar.


Back in the day I was also friendly with some other contemporary Glasgow writers I haven’t mentioned yet because they didn’t really intersect with the scene I’ve been describing. I haven’t had so much contact with Barry Graham since he went to the US and became a Zen monk but we were close before that. We’ve exchanged the odd email since he moved back to Glasgow quite a few years ago now but I haven’t met up with him for years. His novel The Book of Man is a great Trocchi parody. I also got to know Tommy Udo very well in the 1990s, but he’d been living in London for years by then. Tommy started off as a guitarist in Glasgow band The Jolt but quit before they signed a record contract and he made his mark as a music journalist, but he did publish the novel Vatican Bloodbath.


So I was personally familiar with a lot of Glasgow writers before doing the Strathclyde residence. I did get to meet Zoë Wicomb who I’d not encountered before, she’s great. Tim Fountain was another writer I met who was working at Strathclyde when I was there although he’s English. I also met Rodge Glass who took over from me as writer-in-residence and had previously studied at Strathclyde and worked as a secretary for Alasdair Gray, but again he’s English. I was also very impressed with the head of department Jonathan Hope’s no-bullshit approach to teaching English and we had a lot of conversations about both music and literature. There were a lot of great students there too, ordinary kids struggling to pay their way through college and open to trying different approaches to writing. It was good although generally I don’t like to do long stints in institutions, I did two six month sessions with a six month break in between at Strathclyde, which is longer than any other university or art college residency I’ve done. Strathclyde and Glasgow worked very well for me.


During my time at Strathclyde more of my out of office hours were spent talking about music than writing and I had a total groove going to clubs like Divine! and Optimo. I had to restrict my visits to the Banana Leaf - the best Indian restaurant in Scotland - to once a week in order to avoid getting really fat. I’ve long thought Glasgow is the best city in the UK after London, yeah I know I’m biased, I was born in London! But Glasgow is great and I like a lot of other Scottish cities too. Dead Princess is set in Aberdeen and despite what the narrator says about Dundee in Dead Princess, I really love Dundee too. I spent a lot of time in Dundee in the 1980s working on projects with the artist Pete Horobin. I’d also often go and stay with the painter Karen Strang in Stirling back then.


10 Usually I ask what someone is working on at this point in the interview, but as you’ve only just released a novel within the last month or so, I’d imagine you’re taking a well-earned break. What does the future hold; do you have other novels in mind already that you intend to write?


SH: The next published book will be an anthology of horror stories I’ve edited that are set in a London ghost home development of luxury flats aimed at investors. Writers with pieces in it include Paul Ewen, Iphgenia Baal, Christ Petit, Tariq Goddard, Steve Findow, John King, Chloe Aridjis, Tom McCarthy, Katrina Palmer, Bridget Penney and me. It’s a new take on the haunted house story that uses it as a vehicle for social protest. This anthology is called Denizen of the Dead and will be out with Cripplegate Books in a few weeks. The idea is to make publication coincide with the completion of the apartment block the stories are set in. The developers seem to be slightly behind schedule and while a lot of the scaffolding is down, the crane is still up, so I think they’ll still be a few weeks yet.


I’ve finished another novel called Art School Daze (editor's note the title of this was subsequently changed to Art School Orgy), a BDSM extravaganza set in the London of sixty years ago just before it started really swinging - but I’m in no hurry to get it published. Art School Daze was started before She’s My Witch but finished after it, just as She’s My Witch was started before Re-Enter The Dragon but was finished after that book. I was also working on the Denizen of the Dead anthology before I’d finished writing Re-Enter The Dragon or She’s My Witch. It used to be that my books sometimes got published out of order but were written one after the other, now the chronology gets even more jumbled up!


I’ve also done a lot of research into and writing on Eurosleaze films, as well as yoga and other forms of what I call esoteric exercise. By the latter I mean things like tai chi and ki aikido and more obscure stuff including Chinese wand exercises and Frank Rudolph Young’s bodybuilding programmes. However none of this has been completely formulated into finished books yet. But in the future I’d expect to be publishing at least something related to Eurosleaze cinema and a book on esoteric exercise or perhaps more specifically yoga.


11 There are a lot of great songs and a lot of kung-fu movies mentioned in She’s My Witch. If you had to recommend a few of each to interested readers, which would they be?


I think for kung fu films it would have to be two of the Jimmy Wang-Yu vehicles I mention, Master Of The Flying Guillotine and The Man From Hong Kong. Wang-Yu was the big action star in Hong Kong before Bruce Lee. He made his name as an actor with the One-Armed Swordsman series for Shaw Brothers. Master Of The Flying Guillotine is a continuation of Wang-Yu’s one-armed fighter theme in the form of the one-armed boxer and with a kraut rock soundtrack. Man From Hong Kong was made in Australia and directed by Brian Trenchard-Smith and it also features a post-Bond George Lazenby - it doesn’t Hollywoodise the kung fu flick as much as Enter The Dragon, and I’d say it is a better. I much prefer Bruce Lee’s proper Hong Kong vehicles like Fist of Fury to Enter The Dragon!


SH: I mention a lot of Spanish horror films as well as martial arts movies and many of those are well worth checking out, especially Cannibal Man directed by Eloy de la Iglesia, Tombs of the Blind Dead directed by Amando de Ossorio, Werewolf Shadow directed by León Klimovsk, and of course the prolific Jess Franco. The latter gets mentioned a lot but mostly because Maria is watching his movies as they arrive in the post individually but randomly plucked from box sets via LoveFilm. If you’ve never watched a Franco movie try Succubus which isn’t referenced in She’s My Witch but is a lot better than the stuff from the humorously ‘random’ selection of his later films in the book.


Aside from the one it takes its title from, the key song in She’s My Witch is the southern soul classic You Got To Crawl To Me by Johnny Davis, Although Martin doesn’t like What’s This Shit Called Love by The Pagans I think that’s the punk number I’d go for from the book. For original era mod Any More Than I Do by The Attack. And because I mentioned them earlier, I Can’t Wait by Glasgow mod revival band The Jolt. And I have to have something by The Heartbreakers coz Billy Rath appears in the book, so that needs to be Born To Lose.


Also given that the entire novel is structured around the tarot and many different tarot packs are mentioned, it feels like I should recommend a deck. I’ll be really boring and recommend the Rider-Waite-Smith, the most famous occult pack, because its easy to obtain and easy to read, even if Martin after initiation into occult practices has a slightly snobby preference for the much harder to read Tarot de Marseilles and Maria is obsessed by the ultra-gothic Giger Tarot. I’ll also point out that even for those who have no supernatural beliefs, occult divination methods can still be useful as decision aids. If I’m stuck on a choice I have to make I’ll often pull out a tarot deck and use it to help me work out what’s going on in my head. Reading tarot cards is intuitive and as far as I’m concerned there are no hard and fast rules, what you think the card or cards you’ve pulled mean is what they mean, it is subjective. I’m not keen on tarot interpretation books but they can be helpful for beginners, Sometimes just pulling a single card will give you the answer you want, and of course there are many many more complex spreads. It isn’t difficult to read tarot cards, it just takes a little imagination.


Links

She’s My Witch : http://www.london-books.co.uk/books/witch.html

The Art Strike : http://www.inenart.eu/?p=13394

The Necrocard : https://www.stewarthomesociety.org/neoism/necro.htm

Legal Action in Russia : https://www.stewarthomesociety.org/interview.htm

1994 interview cited in Q5 : https://www.stewarthomesociety.org/finn.htm

2006 interview cited in Q8 : http://hodmandod5.blogspot.com/2006/02/stewart-home- interview-writing-about.html


The original posting of this interview was still up on the Common Breath site when it was reposted here: https://thecommonbreath.com/witchesbrew.html